Exposing Urban Legends

The following table shows the standard form of each of the 22 Hebrew letters in order, along with a guide to their pronunciation, their basic meanings, and their English transliterations. Each letter also has a numerical equivalent, which is shown in the table. Certain letters have two values, depending on whether the letter is used within or at the end of a word. See the footnote below for further discussion of this and the threefold division of the alphabet.

There are two individuals (and others I'm sure) that have been put forth by those looking for an anti-christ.  One is William J. Clinton and the other is Prince Charles of Wales.  While there may be compelling documentation for both to play a role in a one world government;  the transliteration of their names do NOT have a Hebraic value of 666.

The chart below is reproduced for the purpose of having an independent source to reference the next time someone puts forth someone's name as equaling 666.

Those letters that have two numerical values take different forms depending on whether or not the letter appears as the final letter in a word. When one of these letters ends a word, it is drawn slightly differently (these 'final' forms are not shown in the table), and has sofit (pronounced sohfeet) added to its name. For example, mem has a value of 40 if it is placed before the end of a word, but has a value of 600 and is called mem sofit if it is the final letter of a word.
*While the sound of the Hebrew letter 'Heh' an h with ê sound; there is no numerical value attached to the letter e during translation.  The same applies to the English letter I when transliterating from the Hebrew letter 'Yod'

If an English letter is missing from this chart; there is no Hebraic equivalent.

While I have clearly said time after time that the elements of an anti-trinity have formed and are even now becoming more cohesive; I believe it is wisdom to keep a few individuals on the radar screen.  While the next section has historical importance; it is given more from the standpoint of demonstrating the framework of the "kings of the earth" mentioned in Psalm 2.

OR   US